Procore has become one of the most recognized names in construction project management software, offering a broad feature set that supports everything from scheduling to budgeting. Its widespread adoption speaks to its capabilities, but that doesn’t mean it’s the perfect match for every construction or infrastructure team.
Some organizations find that Procore’s pricing, complexity, or feature set doesn’t align with their workflows, prompting them to explore other options. That’s where this guide comes in. We’ve rounded up 12 of the best Procore alternatives for 2025, covering platforms built for everything from large-scale infrastructure projects to smaller, utility-focused builds. Whether you’re looking for something more specialized, more affordable, or more flexible, these Procore alternatives can help you find a better software that aligns with your team’s goals.
|
Software |
Pros |
Cons |
Website |
|
Vitruvi |
Specialized for utility and infrastructure projects, geospatial mapping, and real-time reporting |
May be too specialized for general construction projects |
|
|
Autodesk Construction Cloud |
Strong design-build integration, BIM collaboration, and a comprehensive data environment |
Complex implementation, higher cost for smaller teams |
|
|
Trimble |
Owner-centric, strong financial and document controls, ERP integration |
Less intuitive for field teams, costly for smaller portfolios |
|
|
Buildertrend |
User-friendly for residential, strong client communication, mobile-friendly |
Limited scalability, accounting integration issues |
|
|
ProjectManager.com |
Intuitive; good for cross-functional teams, flexible for construction and non-construction |
Lacks deep construction-specific features, generic reporting |
|
|
Smartsheet for Construction |
Highly customizable, integrates with broad tech stacks |
Less industry-specific depth, manual tailoring needed |
|
|
RedTeam |
Strong financial management, contractor-focused design |
Dated experience, complex setup |
|
|
Jonas Construction Software |
Comprehensive financial tools, integrated construction/accounting |
Lacks financial tools, not for complex project management |
|
|
Contractor Foreman |
Budget-friendly, broad feature set for small teams |
Clunky for large projects, limited customization |
|
|
Fieldwire |
Excellent field coordination, easy mobile interface |
Lacks financial tools, not for complex project management |
|
|
Oracle Construction and Engineering |
Enterprise-grade, strong for large-scale projects |
Complex, costly, best for enterprise IT environments |
Procore is one of the most widely recognized construction project management platforms, built to connect office and field teams on projects of all sizes. It’s used across sectors – from large-scale commercial builds to residential developments and complex infrastructure projects – and is known for streamlining communication, documentation, and reporting across multifaceted workflows.
Its broad adoption speaks to its power, but that doesn’t mean it’s the perfect fit for every team. For some, the cost, complexity, or scope of Procore’s feature set may prompt them to explore alternatives that better align with their specific size, budget, or industry needs.
The construction industry isn’t one-size-fits-all, and neither is project management software. While Procore is a leader in the space, plenty of other platforms cater to different sectors, company sizes, and project types. In the list below, you’ll find a diverse range of Procore alternatives, from industry-specific tools for utility and infrastructure work to more affordable, streamlined platforms for smaller teams.
Each option includes an overview of key features, pros, cons, and best-fit scenarios, allowing you to match the right tool to your project's needs, technical requirements, and long-term business goals.
Vitruvi is a modern, specialized construction management solution built for the unique demands of utility and infrastructure projects. It’s particularly well-suited for linear builds—such as telecom networks, energy transmission lines, and water or gas utilities—where geospatial planning and field-to-office coordination are critical.
Key Features:
Differentiator:
Purpose-built for utility and infrastructure construction teams, Vitruvi delivers specialized capabilities that Procore lacks for linear infrastructure projects. From design to close-out, it streamlines workflows, connects data across the project lifecycle, and ensures every stakeholder has the correct information when they need it.
Autodesk Construction Cloud combines design and construction workflows into a single, connected ecosystem, making it a strong alternative to Procore for teams operating in design-build environments. Its deep integration with AutoCAD, Revit, and BIM tools allows for seamless collaboration between architects, engineers, and construction teams.
Key Features:
Pros:
Users appreciate its robust environment that brings together multiple design and construction tools, creating a seamless data flow. It’s especially effective for teams that require detailed modeling and clash detection. The platform’s integration with AutoCAD and Revit enhances collaboration between disciplines.
Cons:
That complexity, however, can translate into a challenging implementation and steep learning curve. Smaller teams may find the higher price point prohibitive, especially if they don’t need the full suite of features.
Best For:
Teams that need robust, end-to-end collaboration from initial design through project completion, especially where BIM workflows are central to success.
Trimble offers a broad suite of construction management tools designed to connect field crews, project managers, and office teams. Known for its strength in geospatial technology and field productivity solutions, Trimble provides end-to-end visibility across infrastructure and capital projects. For organizations comparing Procore alternatives, Trimble stands out with its field-centric approach and strong integration capabilities.
Key Features:
Pros:
Trimble’s field-first design makes it particularly effective for teams that need accurate geolocation data, real-time progress tracking, and strong equipment integration. Its tools support better collaboration between design and construction phases, helping to reduce errors and rework.
Cons:
The platform’s breadth can feel overwhelming, with multiple products and modules that require significant setup and training. Smaller teams may also find the cost and complexity challenging compared to other Procore alternatives.
Best For:
Construction teams and infrastructure providers that prioritize field productivity, geospatial accuracy, and seamless integration between design and execution. Trimble is especially well-suited for large-scale, infrastructure-heavy projects that depend on precise data and field coordination.
Buildertrend is widely recognized for its focus on residential construction, providing tools that enhance communication between builders and clients. This client-centric approach makes it a popular Procore alternative for homebuilders and remodelers.
Key Features:
Pros:
Buildertrend’s user-friendly interface and mobile app allow builders to manage projects and communicate with clients easily. Its CRM and estimating tools help streamline workflows specific to residential construction.
Cons:
While great for residential projects, Buildertrend lacks scalability for larger commercial or infrastructure builds. Some users also report challenges integrating the software with accounting systems.
Best For:
Residential builders and remodelers who want an all-in-one platform to manage projects while delivering a transparent, positive experience to their clients.
ProjectManager.com is a flexible, cloud-based platform designed to give teams visibility across timelines, resources, and budgets. While not strictly construction-focused, it’s a practical Procore alternative for companies that juggle both construction and non-construction workstreams, needing a simple, centralized project view.
Key Features:
Pros:
Users find ProjectManager.com intuitive and easy to adopt across cross-functional teams. Its broad capabilities support teams that handle diverse projects, making it a solid choice when construction is only part of the workload.
Cons:
However, it lacks deep construction-specific features, and some reporting options can feel generic when applied to complex construction projects.
Best For:
ProjectManager.com is well-suited for companies that require a straightforward, general project management tool to support multiple types of workstreams. It’s ideal for teams that handle construction alongside other projects and want a flexible, easy-to-use platform without deep industry-specific features.
Smartsheet adapts its highly customizable project management platform to fit construction workflows. It provides a flexible environment that supports everything from task tracking to complex project reporting, positioning itself as a versatile Procore alternative.
Key Features:
Pros:
Teams value Smartsheet’s customization and its ability to integrate with wider tech stacks, helping construction projects blend with overall business operations.
Cons:
Despite its flexibility, Smartsheet lacks the industry-specific depth of platforms like Procore and often requires manual effort to tailor workflows to construction needs.
Best For:
Smartsheet is ideal for teams that value flexibility and customization over construction-specific features. It suits organizations that wish to customize their workflows and integrate construction projects with broader business processes.
Built by contractors for contractors, RedTeam focuses on streamlining project financials, document management, and field collaboration. It serves as a practical Procore alternative for general contractors who prioritize contract and cost control.
Key Features:
Pros:
Users praise RedTeam for its strong financial management capabilities and a contractor-centric design that reflects real-world workflows.
Cons:
Its user interface is not as modern as some competitors, and new users may face a learning curve during onboarding.
Best For:
RedTeam is best suited for general contractors who need strong financial and contract management but prefer software developed by individuals who understand their daily challenges. It supports teams focused on cost control and contract oversight, while effectively managing project collaboration.
Jonas offers a fully integrated ERP solution that combines accounting, project management, and service management into a single platform. As a Procore alternative, it provides in-depth financial insights and real-time job costing for contractors.
Key Features:
Pros:
Jonas stands out with comprehensive financial tools and tight integration between construction operations and accounting functions.
Cons:
The platform’s user experience feels dated, and setup can be complex, requiring significant effort during onboarding.
Best For:
Jonas is a solid choice for contractors looking for an ERP-level platform that deeply integrates accounting and project management functions. It suits organizations that require detailed financial oversight alongside construction workflows, although a more comprehensive onboarding process may be necessary.
Contractor Foreman is an affordable, all-in-one project management solution targeting small to mid-sized contractors. It offers a broad feature set that combines project, safety, and financial tools in one platform.
Key Features:
Pros:
Users appreciate Contractor Foreman’s budget-friendly pricing and its ability to provide essential construction management features for smaller teams.
Cons:
The platform can feel clunky when handling larger or more complex projects, and customization options are somewhat limited.
Best For:
Contractor Foreman is ideal for small to mid-sized contractors who want an affordable, all-in-one platform. It’s best for teams that need essential project, safety, and financial tools but don’t require extensive customization or scalability for complex projects.
Fieldwire is a field-first construction management platform focused on task management and jobsite coordination. It’s a straightforward Procore alternative for teams that prioritize field productivity and real-time communication.
Key Features:
Pros:
Fieldwire excels with its intuitive mobile interface and robust support for field coordination. It helps teams stay connected even in areas with limited connectivity.
Cons:
However, it lacks financial management tools and isn’t built for complex project management needs.
Best For:
Fieldwire suits field teams that prioritize simple, efficient coordination and task management on the jobsite. It’s a good fit for crews who need mobile-first tools to stay productive, but it’s not built for managing financials or complex project schedules.
Oracle Construction and Engineering provides enterprise-grade tools designed for large-scale construction and engineering projects. It integrates scheduling, risk management, and project controls with other Oracle products like Primavera and ERP systems.
Key Features:
Pros:
The platform offers powerful capabilities for managing complex projects at an enterprise level and is trusted by large infrastructure teams worldwide.
Cons:
Its complexity and cost make it best suited for enterprise IT environments with dedicated resources.
Best For:
Oracle Construction and Engineering is designed for enterprise teams managing large-scale, complex infrastructure or engineering projects. It works best where organizations have dedicated IT support to handle their complexity and where powerful integration with ERP and Primavera is critical.
When exploring Procore alternatives, it’s essential to focus on features that align with your company’s size and the scope of your projects. Look for flexibility that lets the software scale from small to large jobs without overwhelming your team. Effective field and office collaboration tools are essential to keep everyone aligned, whether they’re on-site or behind a desk. Strong reporting and forecasting capabilities help you stay ahead of deadlines and budgets. Seamless integration with accounting, ERP, and GIS systems, when relevant, can streamline data flow and reduce duplicate work. Finally, consider whether you need industry-specific tools tailored to your niche or more general project management features.
Choosing the best Procore alternative depends heavily on your project type, company size, and technical requirements. Vitruvi stands out for utility and infrastructure construction teams thanks to its specialized workflows, geospatial project management, and real-time field-to-office alignment. If you manage linear projects or work heavily with telecom, energy, or utilities, Vitruvi offers capabilities purpose-built for your industry. Take time to evaluate options that truly fit your unique workflows and operational needs to ensure your software investment delivers maximum value.
Let’s talk about how Vitruvi can transform your projects.